A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455

A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455 Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X3 455

3 / 3

1,938

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Athlon II X3 455 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X3 455

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,938 vs 1,948).
❌Launch MSRP is still $88 MSRP, while A10-4600M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4600M better than Athlon II X3 455?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II X3 455 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A10-4600M pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4600M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4600M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4600M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $88 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Athlon II X3 455 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (22.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4600M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X3 455

The Athlon II X3 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $88.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 455 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4600M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 455 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 455 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 455 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Athlon II X3 455's 1,938 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4600M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A10-4600M	Athlon II X3 455
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+33%	3 / 3
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,948	1,938
Geekbench 6 Single	342	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 455 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4600M versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 455 — the A10-4600M supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X3 455 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4600M) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 455) — the A10-4600M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 455).

Feature	A10-4600M	Athlon II X3 455
Socket	FS1r2	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4600M) / not specified (Athlon II X3 455). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II X3 455 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M.