A10-4600M
VS
Athlon II X3 455

A10-4600M vs Athlon II X3 455

AMD

A10-4600M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 455

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4600M is positioned at rank 661 and the Athlon II X3 455 is on rank 750, so the A10-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-4600M

#649
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
904%
#650
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
890%
#651
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
817%
#652
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
814%
#653
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
806%
#655
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
779%
#656
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
747%
#657
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
745%
#658
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
725%
#661
A10-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 455

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14156%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13376%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9712%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2926%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2318%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2027%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1146%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1044%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1043%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1032%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1004%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
990%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
986%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
977%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
100%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
100%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
99%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
99%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
99%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
99%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
98%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
98%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
97%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
97%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X3 455 leads in gaming performance. However, the A10-4600M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA10-4600MAthlon II X3 455
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-4600MAthlon II X3 455
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-4600M and Athlon II X3 455

AMD

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

AMD

Athlon II X3 455

The Athlon II X3 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $88.

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X3 455 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the A10-4600M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 455 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 455 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X3 455 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Athlon II X3 455's 1,938 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-4600M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA10-4600MAthlon II X3 455
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+33%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,948
1,938
Geekbench 6 Single
342
Geekbench 6 Multi
916
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X3 455 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Athlon II X3 455 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4600M) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 455) — the A10-4600M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 455).

FeatureA10-4600MAthlon II X3 455
Socket
FS1r2
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4600M) / not specified (Athlon II X3 455). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II X3 455 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M.

FeatureA10-4600MAthlon II X3 455
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop