A10-4600M vs Core i5-3439Y

A10-4600M vs Core i5-3439Y Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-3439Y

2 / 4

1,957

+0.5%

Pentium Extreme Edition 955

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Core i5-3439Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Core i5-3439Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (342 vs 472).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (916 vs 966).

Core i5-3439Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+38% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3439Y better than A10-4600M?

Yes. Core i5-3439Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 5.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.5% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3439Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3439Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3439Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-3439Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-3439Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4600M vs Core i5-3439Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-3439Y

The Core i5-3439Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,957 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3439Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-3439Y — a 32.7% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3439Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Core i5-3439Y's 1,957 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-3439Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 342 vs 472, a 31.9% lead for the Core i5-3439Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 916 vs 966 (5.3% advantage for the Core i5-3439Y). L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3439Y.

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i5-3439Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+53%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)	256K (per core)+6300%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,948	1,957
Geekbench 6 Single	342	472+38%
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	966+5%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3439Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i5-3439Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and 7-series (Core i5-3439Y).

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i5-3439Y
Socket	FS1r2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs VT-x (Core i5-3439Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660G (A10-4600M) and HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3439Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-3439Y targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Core i5-3439Y rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.