A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T

A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-3220T

2 / 4

1,953

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (342 vs 465).
❌Lower PassMark (1,948 vs 1,953).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-3220T.

Core i3-3220T

2012

Why buy it

✅+36% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-4600M.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while A10-4600M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-3220T better than A10-4600M?

Yes. Core i3-3220T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-3220T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-3220T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-3220T is the better buy right now. Core i3-3220T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $149 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-3220T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 13.3% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-3220T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 342 vs 465, a 30.5% lead for the Core i3-3220T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i3-3220T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+14%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,948	1,953
Geekbench 6 Single	342	465+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3220T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T).

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i3-3220T
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660G (A10-4600M) and HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3220T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop, Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i3-3220T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 7660G	HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, EPT
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	Low Power Desktop