A10-4600M
VS
Core i3-3220T

A10-4600M vs Core i3-3220T

AMD

A10-4600M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4600M is positioned at rank 661 and the Core i3-3220T is on rank 939, so the A10-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-4600M

#649
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
904%
#650
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
890%
#651
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
817%
#652
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
814%
#653
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
806%
#655
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
779%
#656
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
747%
#657
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
745%
#658
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
725%
#661
A10-4600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#662
Athlon II P360
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
99%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3220T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22467%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16313%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4914%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3893%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3405%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1950%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1925%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1733%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1686%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1663%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1656%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1641%
#939
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
100%
#940
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
99%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#948
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3220T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A10-4600M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA10-4600MCore i3-3220T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA10-4600MCore i3-3220T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-4600M and Core i3-3220T

AMD

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 13.3% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-3220T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 342 vs 465, a 30.5% lead for the Core i3-3220T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

FeatureA10-4600MCore i3-3220T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,948
1,953
Geekbench 6 Single
342
465+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi
916
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-3220T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and B75,Z75,Z77,H77,Q75,Q77,H61,H67,P67,Z68 (Core i3-3220T).

FeatureA10-4600MCore i3-3220T
Socket
FS1r2
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7660G (A10-4600M) and HD Graphics 2500 (Core i3-3220T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop, Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

FeatureA10-4600MCore i3-3220T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660G
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Laptop
Low Power Desktop