A10-4600M vs Athlon II P360

A10-4600M vs Athlon II P360 Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II P360

2 / 2

1,946

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II P360 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II P360: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Athlon II P360 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Athlon II P360

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,946 vs 1,948).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A10-4600M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4600M better than Athlon II P360?

Yes. A10-4600M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-4600M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-4600M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4600M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-4600M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II P360 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g4.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4600M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4600M vs Athlon II P360 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II P360

The Athlon II P360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II P360 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II P360 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the A10-4600M. The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II P360 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Athlon II P360's 1,946 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-4600M.

Feature	A10-4600M	Athlon II P360
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+39%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+300%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,948	1,946
Geekbench 6 Single	342	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II P360 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4600M versus 1066 on the Athlon II P360 — the A10-4600M supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-4600M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4600M) vs 0 (Athlon II P360) — the A10-4600M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and S1g4 (Athlon II P360).

Feature	A10-4600M	Athlon II P360
Socket	FS1r2	S1g4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs true (Athlon II P360). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II P360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Athlon II P360 rivals Pentium P6000.