CPU
GPU
A10-4600M
Athlon II P360
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-4600M is positioned at rank 661 and the Athlon II P360 is on rank 662, so the A10-4600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-4600M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II P360
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-4600M | Athlon II P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-4600M | Athlon II P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-4600M and Athlon II P360
A10-4600M
The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.
Athlon II P360
The Athlon II P360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II P360 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon II P360 — a 32.7% clock advantage for the A10-4600M. The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II P360 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Athlon II P360's 1,946 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-4600M.
| Feature | A10-4600M | Athlon II P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+300% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,948 | 1,946 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 342 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 916 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II P360 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A10-4600M versus 1066 on the Athlon II P360 — the Athlon II P360 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-4600M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-4600M) vs 0 (Athlon II P360) — the A10-4600M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A70M (A10-4600M) and S1g4 (Athlon II P360).
| Feature | A10-4600M | Athlon II P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | S1g4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | 1066+35433% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+209715100% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-4600M) vs true (Athlon II P360). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Athlon II P360 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M; Athlon II P360 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | A10-4600M | Athlon II P360 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660G | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-4600M and Athlon II P360
