A10-4600M vs Core i3-4025U

A10-4600M vs Core i3-4025U Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4025U

2 / 4

1,949

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-4025U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-4025U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Core i3-4025U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,948 vs 1,949).

Core i3-4025U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4025U better than A10-4600M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-4600M is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4025U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4025U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4025U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4025U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4025U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-4600M vs Core i3-4025U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-4025U

The Core i3-4025U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,949 points. Launch price was $275.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-4600M packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4025U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-4600M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4025U — a 51% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4025U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Core i3-4025U's 1,949 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4025U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4025U.

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i3-4025U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+68%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+21%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+700%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,948	1,949
Geekbench 6 Single	342	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4025U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4600M	Core i3-4025U
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4600M) / not specified (Core i3-4025U). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Core i3-4025U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M.