A10-4600M vs Xeon E5506

A10-4600M vs Xeon E5506 Performance Spectrum

A10-4600M

4 / 4

1,948

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5506

4 / 4

1,961

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-4600M vs Xeon E5506 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-4600M vs Xeon E5506: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-4600M

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660G, while Xeon E5506 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,948 vs 1,961).

Xeon E5506

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-4600M across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-4600M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-4600M better than Xeon E5506?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5506 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-4600M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5506 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-4600M still makes the most sense overall. A10-4600M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-4600M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-4600M vs Xeon E5506 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-4600M

The A10-4600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,948 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon E5506

The Xeon E5506 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,961 points. Launch price was $43.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-4600M and Xeon E5506 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A10-4600M versus 0.13 GHz on the Xeon E5506 — a 184.4% clock advantage for the A10-4600M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A10-4600M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5506 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-4600M scores 1,948 against the Xeon E5506's 1,961 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5506. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-4600M vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5506.

Feature	A10-4600M	Xeon E5506
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+2362%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+8%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark	1,948	1,961
Geekbench 6 Single	342	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	916	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-4600M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5506 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-4600M	Xeon E5506
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-4600M) / not specified (Xeon E5506). The A10-4600M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660G), while the Xeon E5506 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-4600M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-4600M rivals Core i3-2310M.