Athlon II X3 455 vs Opteron 3320 EE

Athlon II X3 455 vs Opteron 3320 EE Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X3 455

3 / 3

1,938

+1.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Opteron 3320 EE

4 / 4

1,918

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 455 vs Opteron 3320 EE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 455 vs Opteron 3320 EE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 455

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 3320 EE, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $88 MSRP, while Opteron 3320 EE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.

Opteron 3320 EE

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X3 455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,918 vs 1,938).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X3 455 better than Opteron 3320 EE?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 3320 EE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Athlon II X3 455 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X3 455 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X3 455 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X3 455 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X3 455 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $88 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron 3320 EE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X3 455 vs Opteron 3320 EE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 455

The Athlon II X3 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 December 2010 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,938 points. Launch price was $88.

Opteron 3320 EE

The Opteron 3320 EE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Delhi (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,918 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 455 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Opteron 3320 EE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron 3320 EE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Athlon II X3 455 versus 2.5 GHz on the Opteron 3320 EE — a 27.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 455 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Athlon II X3 455 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses Delhi (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 455 scores 1,938 against the Opteron 3320 EE's 1,918 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X3 455. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 455 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 3320 EE.

Feature	Athlon II X3 455	Opteron 3320 EE
Cores / Threads	3 / 3	4 / 4+33%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+32%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+74%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	4096 kB+700%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Delhi (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,938+1%	1,918

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 455 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 3320 EE uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.