Athlon II X3 460 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X3 460

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $242 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,965 vs 22,430).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +425.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 201.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 22.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
278.2% HIGHER MSRP
$329 MSRPvs$87 MSRP
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X3 460.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Athlon II X3 460?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 425.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1041.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 425.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1041.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 278.2% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $87 MSRP, and it still gives you a 425.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 201.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 22.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 3/3. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X3 460 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X3 460

The Athlon II X3 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,965 points. Launch price was $50.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X3 460 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon II X3 460 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Athlon II X3 460 uses the Rana (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X3 460 scores 1,965 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 167.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 460 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Athlon II X3 460	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	3 / 3	8 / 16+167%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	45 nm	7 nm, 12 nm-84%
Architecture	Rana (2009−2011)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	1,965	22,430+1041%
Geekbench 6 Single	384	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	944	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X3 460 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X3 460 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X3 460) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 760G,770,785G,790FX,870,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X3 460) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Athlon II X3 460	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	AM3	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR4-3200+140%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	128 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X3 460) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Athlon II X3 460 targets Budget.

Feature	Athlon II X3 460	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X3 460 was priced at $87, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($87 vs $329), Athlon II X3 460 was $242 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X3 460 delivers 22.6 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 100.5% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X3 460	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$87-74%	$329
Performance per Dollar	22.6	68.2+202%
Release Date	2011	2019

Search Athlon II X3 460 on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.