
Athlon II X4 615e

Athlon II X4 620
Athlon II X4 615e vs Athlon II X4 620 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 615e vs Athlon II X4 620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 615e vs Athlon II X4 620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 615e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon II X4 620.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,018 vs 2,026).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($186 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Athlon II X4 620
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $186 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 88.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $186 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 615e.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 620 better than Athlon II X4 615e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 615e vs Athlon II X4 620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 615e
The Athlon II X4 615e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,018 points. Launch price was $59.

Athlon II X4 620
The Athlon II X4 620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,026 points. Launch price was $65.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 615e and Athlon II X4 620 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X4 615e versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 620 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 615e scores 2,018 against the Athlon II X4 620's 2,026 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 620. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Athlon II X4 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,018 | 2,026 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,161 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 331 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,161 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 620 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 615e) vs 0 (Athlon II X4 620) — the Athlon II X4 615e offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,AMD 880G,AMD 890FX,AMD 990FX (Athlon II X4 615e) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Athlon II X4 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 615e) / not specified (Athlon II X4 620). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 615e targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 615e rivals Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Athlon II X4 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 615e was priced at $186, while the Athlon II X4 620 came in at $99. On launch pricing ($186 vs $99), Athlon II X4 620 was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 615e delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 620 — making the Athlon II X4 620 the 61.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Athlon II X4 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $186 | $99-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 20.5+90% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















