Athlon II X4 615e
Celeron G3930T
Athlon II X4 615e vs Celeron G3930T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 615e vs Celeron G3930T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 615e vs Celeron G3930T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 615e
2010Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (331 vs 704).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,161 vs 1,350).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 48.2 PassMark/$ ($186 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron G3930T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+112.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $144 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $186 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 344.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 48.2 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $186 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X4 615e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G3930T better than Athlon II X4 615e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 615e vs Celeron G3930T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X4 615e
The Athlon II X4 615e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,018 points. Launch price was $59.
Celeron G3930T
The Celeron G3930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,023 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 615e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3930T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 615e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X4 615e versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G3930T — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Athlon II X4 615e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G3930T uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 615e scores 2,018 against the Celeron G3930T's 2,023 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G3930T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 331 vs 704, a 72.1% lead for the Celeron G3930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,161 vs 1,350 (15.1% advantage for the Celeron G3930T). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 615e vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,018 | 2,023 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,161 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 331 | 704+113% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,161 | 1,350+16% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 615e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G3930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 615e versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930T — the Celeron G3930T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,AMD 880G,AMD 890FX,AMD 990FX (Athlon II X4 615e) and H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930T).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2400+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 615e has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 615e) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron G3930T). The Celeron G3930T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 615e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 615e targets Gaming, Celeron G3930T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 615e rivals Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300; Celeron G3930T rivals Pentium G4560T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 615e was priced at $186, while the Celeron G3930T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($186 vs $42), Celeron G3930T was $144 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 615e delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 48.2 pts/$ for the Celeron G3930T — making the Celeron G3930T the 126.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $186 | $42-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 48.2+346% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 615e and Celeron G3930T
