
Athlon II X4 615e

Core i3-5005U
Athlon II X4 615e vs Core i3-5005U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 615e vs Core i3-5005U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 615e vs Core i3-5005U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 615e
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-5005U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (331 vs 617).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,161 vs 1,227).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $186 MSRP, while Core i3-5005U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-5005U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-5005U
2015Why buy it
- ✅+86.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 5500, while Athlon II X4 615e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 615e.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-5005U better than Athlon II X4 615e?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 615e vs Core i3-5005U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 615e
The Athlon II X4 615e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,018 points. Launch price was $59.

Core i3-5005U
The Core i3-5005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,012 points. Launch price was $275.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 615e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-5005U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 615e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Athlon II X4 615e versus 2 GHz on the Core i3-5005U — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 615e (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 615e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-5005U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 615e scores 2,018 against the Core i3-5005U's 2,012 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon II X4 615e. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 331 vs 617, a 60.3% lead for the Core i3-5005U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,161 vs 1,227 (5.5% advantage for the Core i3-5005U). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 615e vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-5005U.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Broadwell-U (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,018 | 2,012 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,161 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 331 | 617+86% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,161 | 1,227+6% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 615e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-5005U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 615e versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5005U — the Core i3-5005U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 615e) vs 12 (Core i3-5005U) — the Athlon II X4 615e offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 870,AMD 880G,AMD 890FX,AMD 990FX (Athlon II X4 615e) and Intel Broadwell-U (Core i3-5005U).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1600+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 615e) vs true (Core i3-5005U). The Core i3-5005U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 5500), while the Athlon II X4 615e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 615e targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Athlon II X4 615e rivals Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 615e | Core i3-5005U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 5500 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















