Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K

AMD

Athlon II X4 620e

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 750K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 620e

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 8.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $99 MSRPvs$91 MSRP

Athlon X4 750K

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $8 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,906).
  • 122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Athlon II X4 620e?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 750K is ahead with a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 620e pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 620e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon X4 750K is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750K comes in $8 cheaper on MSRP at $91 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon II X4 620e is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 7.8% better value on MSRP (31.6 vs 29.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 750K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X4 620e

The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Athlon X4 750K

The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 620e and Athlon X4 750K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X4 750K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620e scores 2,906 against the Athlon X4 750K's 2,879 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 620e.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620eAthlon X4 750K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
4 GHz+54%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
4 MB (total)+700%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Propus (2009−2011)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,906
2,879
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 620e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 750K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620e versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K — the Athlon X4 750K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X4 620e) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750K) — the Athlon X4 750K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620e) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K).

FeatureAthlon II X4 620eAthlon X4 750K
Socket
AM3
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1866+40%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 620e was priced at $99, while the Athlon X4 750K came in at $91. On launch pricing ($99 vs $91), Athlon X4 750K was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620e delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 750K — making the Athlon X4 750K the 7.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X4 620eAthlon X4 750K
MSRP
$99
$91-8%
Performance per Dollar
29.4
31.6+7%
Release Date
2011
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.