
Athlon II X4 620e

Athlon X4 750K
Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 620e
2011Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌8.8% HIGHER MSRP$99 MSRPvs$91 MSRP
Athlon X4 750K
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($91 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,879 vs 2,906).
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 750K better than Athlon II X4 620e?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 620e vs Athlon X4 750K Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620e
The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 750K
The Athlon X4 750K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,879 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 620e and Athlon X4 750K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750K — a 42.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750K (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X4 750K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620e scores 2,906 against the Athlon X4 750K's 2,879 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II X4 620e.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Athlon X4 750K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,906 | 2,879 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 620e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 750K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X4 620e versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 750K — the Athlon X4 750K supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 750K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X4 620e) vs 16 (Athlon X4 750K) — the Athlon X4 750K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620e) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 750K).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Athlon X4 750K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1866+40% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 620e was priced at $99, while the Athlon X4 750K came in at $91. On launch pricing ($99 vs $91), Athlon X4 750K was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620e delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 31.6 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 750K — making the Athlon X4 750K the 7.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Athlon X4 750K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $91-8% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.4 | 31.6+7% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















