
Athlon II X4 620e

Atom Z3735G
Athlon II X4 620e vs Atom Z3735G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 620e vs Atom Z3735G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X4 620e vs Atom Z3735G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 620e
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 29.4 vs 170.1 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $17 MSRP).
- ❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3735G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom Z3735G
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($17 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 479.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.1 vs 29.4 PassMark/$ ($17 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon II X4 620e needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon II X4 620e across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,891 vs 2,906).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X4 620e better than Atom Z3735G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 620e vs Atom Z3735G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 620e
The Athlon II X4 620e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,906 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom Z3735G
The Atom Z3735G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA592. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,891 points. Launch price was $17.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X4 620e and Atom Z3735G share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 620e versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom Z3735G — a 34.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 620e (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Athlon II X4 620e uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom Z3735G uses Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 620e scores 2,906 against the Atom Z3735G's 2,891 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon II X4 620e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 620e vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Atom Z3735G.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Atom Z3735G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+42% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+95% | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 2,906 | 2,891 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 620e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z3735G uses UTFCBGA592 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 620e supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 1 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon II X4 620e) vs 1 (Atom Z3735G). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM3 (Athlon II X4 620e) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3735G).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Atom Z3735G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | UTFCBGA592 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-RS 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+3100% | 1 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom Z3735G includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II X4 620e requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Atom Z3735G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 620e was priced at $99, while the Atom Z3735G came in at $17. On launch pricing ($99 vs $17), Atom Z3735G was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 620e delivers 29.4 pts/$ vs 170.1 pts/$ for the Atom Z3735G — making the Atom Z3735G the 141.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 620e | Atom Z3735G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | $17-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.4 | 170.1+479% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















