Athlon MP 2800+ vs Atom D425

Athlon MP 2800+ vs Atom D425 Performance Spectrum

Athlon MP 2800+

1 / 1

380

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom D425

1 / 2

385

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon MP 2800+ vs Atom D425 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon MP 2800+ vs Atom D425: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon MP 2800+

2003

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (380 vs 385).
❌Launch MSRP is still $275 MSRP, while Atom D425 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌500% higher power demand at 60W vs 10W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D425 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom D425

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 60W, a 50W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon MP 2800+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom D425 better than Athlon MP 2800+?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon MP 2800+ is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom D425 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom D425 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom D425 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom D425 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $275 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. Athlon MP 2800+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2003 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on that older platform.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom D425 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon MP 2800+ vs Atom D425 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon MP 2800+

The Athlon MP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 May 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $275.

Atom D425

The Atom D425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $993.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon MP 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom D425's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Athlon MP 2800+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom D425 — a 15.2% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2800+. The Athlon MP 2800+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Atom D425 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2800+ scores 380 against the Atom D425's 385 — a 1.3% lead for the Atom D425.

Feature	Athlon MP 2800+	Atom D425
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+16%	1.83 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB (per core)
Process	130 nm	45 nm-65%
Architecture	K7 (2000−2004)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	380	385+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2800+ versus DDR3-800 on the Atom D425 — the Atom D425 supports -400.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2800+) and Intel NM10 (Atom D425).