Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Athlon MP 2800+

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Athlon MP 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Athlon MP 2800+ Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2600+
1 / 1
392
+3.2%
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoAthlon XP 2000+
brand logoAthlon XP 2400+
brand logoAthlon XP 2600+
brand logoRyzen AI 5 340
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Athlon MP 2800+
1 / 1
380
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1700+
brand logoAthlon XP 2000+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoAthlon 64 2000+
brand logoRyzen 5 PRO 5655G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Athlon MP 2800+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon 64 2600+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Athlon MP 2800+
low10 FPS
medium10 FPS
high10 FPS
ultra10 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Athlon MP 2800+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2600+

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
  • ✅Costs $175 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $275 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 183.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 1.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $275 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon MP 2800+

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (380 vs 392).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($275 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
    • ❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon 64 2600+ better than Athlon MP 2800+?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon MP 2800+ is ahead with 33.1% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2600+ pulls ahead with 3.2% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 2600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.2% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon 64 2600+ is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 2600+ comes in $175 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $275 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon MP 2800+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with 33.1% higher max boost clock. It is also 183.7% better value on MSRP (3.9 vs 1.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon 64 2600+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon 64 2600+ vs Athlon MP 2800+ Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon 64 2600+

    The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Athlon MP 2800+

    The Athlon MP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 May 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $275.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon 64 2600+ and Athlon MP 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus 2.13 GHz on the Athlon MP 2800+ — a 28.4% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2800+. The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon MP 2800+ uses K7 (2000−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2600+ scores 392 against the Athlon MP 2800+'s 380 — a 3.1% lead for the Athlon 64 2600+.

    FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Athlon MP 2800+
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.13 GHz+33%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    —
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB
    Process
    65 nm-50%
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Lima (2008−2009)
    K7 (2000−2004)
    PassMark
    392+3%
    380
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2800+ — the Athlon 64 2600+ supports -350.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 2600+) vs 1 (Athlon MP 2800+). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+) and AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2800+).

    FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Athlon MP 2800+
    Socket
    AM2
    —
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    DDR-266
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB+300%
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    2+100%
    1
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon 64 2600+ was priced at $100, while the Athlon MP 2800+ came in at $275. On launch pricing ($100 vs $275), Athlon 64 2600+ was $175 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2600+ delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 1.4 pts/$ for the Athlon MP 2800+ — making the Athlon 64 2600+ the 95.7% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Athlon MP 2800+
    MSRP
    $100-64%
    $275
    Performance per Dollar
    3.9+179%
    1.4
    Release Date
    2008
    2003
    Search Athlon 64 2600+ on AmazonSearch Athlon MP 2800+ on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.