Athlon 64 2600+
VS
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

1 Cores2 Thrd66 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 2600+ is positioned at rank 1080 and the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is on rank 771, so the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
79519%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
75138%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
54556%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16435%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
13019%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11389%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6523%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5862%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5861%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5796%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5639%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5560%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5538%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5488%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
91%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
91%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
90%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
89%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
87%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
85%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
84%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
84%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
84%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
83%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
82%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
79%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

#759
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1114%
#760
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1098%
#761
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1008%
#762
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1003%
#763
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
994%
#765
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
960%
#766
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
921%
#767
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
919%
#768
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
894%
#771
Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#772
Core i7-9750HF
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon 64 2600+ in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon 64 2600+Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 2600+Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 2600+ and Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.66

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 66 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 395 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2600+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus 2.67 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 — a 50.1% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66. The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2600+ scores 392 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66's 395 — a 0.8% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.67 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
65 nm-50%
130 nm
Architecture
Lima (2008−2009)
Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark
392
395
Geekbench 6 Single
800
Geekbench 6 Multi
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 2600+) vs 1 (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+) and 852PM,855PM (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66).

FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Socket
AM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon 64 2600+) / None (Mobile Pentium 4 2.66). Primary use case: Mobile Pentium 4 2.66 targets Legacy Laptop.

FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Mobile Pentium 4 2.66
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
None
Target Use
Legacy Laptop