Athlon 64 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.60

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.60 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2600+

1 / 1

392

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 1.60

1 / 1

405

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2600+

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 24W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (392 vs 405).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 1.60

2003

Why buy it

✅+3.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌60% higher power demand at 24W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 1.60 better than Athlon 64 2600+?

Yes. Pentium M 1.60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 3.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 1.60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 1.60 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 1.60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 3.3% higher PassMark. Athlon 64 2600+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 2600+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Pentium M 1.60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium M 1.60

The Pentium M 1.60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 2600+ and Pentium M 1.60 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Pentium M 1.60 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 1.60 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2600+ scores 392 against the Pentium M 1.60's 405 — a 3.3% lead for the Pentium M 1.60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2600+	Pentium M 1.60
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	65 nm-50%	130 nm
Architecture	Lima (2008−2009)	Banias (2003)
PassMark	392	405+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 1.60 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.