Athlon 64 2600+ vs Atom N475

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Atom N475 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 2600+

1 / 1

392

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom N475

1 / 2

405

+3.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Atom N475 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Atom N475: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 2600+

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (392 vs 405).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 5.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N475 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Atom N475

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon 64 2600+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom N475 better than Athlon 64 2600+?

Yes. Atom N475 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom N475 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom N475 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom N475 is the better buy right now. Atom N475 comes in $25 cheaper on MSRP at $75 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 37.8% better value on MSRP (5.4 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N475 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Atom N475 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom N475

The Atom N475 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pineview (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 405 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 2600+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom N475's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom N475 — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Atom N475. The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom N475 uses Pineview (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2600+ scores 392 against the Atom N475's 405 — a 3.3% lead for the Atom N475. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 2600+	Atom N475
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.83 GHz+14%
Base Clock	—	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512K (per core)
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Lima (2008−2009)	Pineview (2009−2011)
PassMark	392	405+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom N475 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. The Athlon 64 2600+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon 64 2600+) vs 1 (Atom N475). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2600+) and Intel NM10 (Atom N475).

Feature	Athlon 64 2600+	Atom N475
Socket	AM2	FCBGA559
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom N475 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon 64 2600+ requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Athlon 64 2600+	Atom N475
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Intel GMA 3150

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 2600+ was priced at $100, while the Atom N475 came in at $75. On launch pricing ($100 vs $75), Atom N475 was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 2600+ delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 5.4 pts/$ for the Atom N475 — making the Atom N475 the 31.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 2600+	Atom N475
MSRP	$100	$75-25%
Performance per Dollar	3.9	5.4+38%
Release Date	2008	2010

Search Athlon 64 2600+ on Amazon

Search Atom N475 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.