Athlon 64 2600+
VS
Sempron 3200+

Athlon 64 2600+ vs Sempron 3200+

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

1 Cores1 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Sempron 3200+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 2600+ is positioned at rank 1080 and the Sempron 3200+ is on rank 943, so the Sempron 3200+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
79519%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
75138%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
54556%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
16435%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
13019%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
11389%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
6523%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
6438%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
5862%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
5861%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
5796%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
5639%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
5560%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
5538%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
5488%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
100%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
91%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
91%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
90%
#1085
Athlon XP 2600+
MSRP: $98|Avg: $10
89%
#1086
Core i7-965
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $40
87%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
85%
#1088
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
84%
#1089
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
84%
#1090
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
84%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
83%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
83%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
82%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
79%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
77%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23923%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22605%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16413%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4945%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3917%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3426%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1962%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1937%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1763%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1763%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1744%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1697%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1673%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1666%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1651%
#943
Sempron 3200+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#944
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
100%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#948
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
97%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
97%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
97%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
#955
Athlon II X2 250
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
95%
#956
Core i3-2120T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $38
95%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
94%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Sempron 3200+ leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 2600+ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 2600+Sempron 3200+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 2600+Sempron 3200+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 2600+ and Sempron 3200+

AMD

Athlon 64 2600+

The Athlon 64 2600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 392 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Sempron 3200+

The Sempron 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 391 points. Launch price was $13.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 2600+ and Sempron 3200+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 2600+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Sempron 3200+ — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Sempron 3200+. The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the Lima (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron 3200+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 2600+ scores 392 against the Sempron 3200+'s 391 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 2600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Sempron 3200+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
1.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
65 nm-28%
90 nm
Architecture
Lima (2008−2009)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
392
391
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 2600+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3200+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 2600+Sempron 3200+
Socket
AM2
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0