Athlon X2 BE-2300
Celeron J1800
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron J1800 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron J1800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron J1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 BE-2300
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Celeron J1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron J1800
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon X2 BE-2300 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 BE-2300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (820 vs 905).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 BE-2300 better than Celeron J1800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron J1800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon X2 BE-2300
The Athlon X2 BE-2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron J1800
The Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $72.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 BE-2300 and Celeron J1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 versus 2.58 GHz on the Celeron J1800 — a 30.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J1800. The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron J1800 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2300 scores 905 against the Celeron J1800's 820 — a 9.9% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1800.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2300 | Celeron J1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.58 GHz+36% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.41 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| PassMark | 905+10% | 820 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 250 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J1800 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1800 — the Celeron J1800 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2300 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2300) vs 4 (Celeron J1800) — the Celeron J1800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2300) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1800).
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2300 | Celeron J1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3L-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2300) / VT-x (Celeron J1800). The Celeron J1800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon X2 BE-2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1800 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1800 rivals Pentium J2850.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2300 | Celeron J1800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X2 BE-2300 and Celeron J1800
