Athlon X2 BE-2300
E2-2000
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs E2-2000 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs E2-2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs E2-2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 BE-2300
2007Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while E2-2000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 45W vs 18W.
E2-2000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 45W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X2 BE-2300 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (880 vs 905).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 BE-2300 better than E2-2000?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs E2-2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon X2 BE-2300
The Athlon X2 BE-2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $149.
E2-2000
The E2-2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.75 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 880 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 BE-2300 and E2-2000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 versus 1.75 GHz on the E2-2000 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2300. The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the E2-2000 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2300 scores 905 against the E2-2000's 880 — a 2.8% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2300 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz+9% | 1.75 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 40 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 905+3% | 880 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E2-2000 uses FT1 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2300 | E2-2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FT1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X2 BE-2300 and E2-2000
