Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron P4505

AMD

Athlon X2 BE-2300

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron P4505

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron P4505 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron P4505 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron P4505: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 BE-2300

2007

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (905 vs 918).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
    • 28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4505 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Celeron P4505

    2010

    Why buy it

    • +1.4% higher PassMark.
    • Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
    • Delivers 17.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
    • Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron P4505 better than Athlon X2 BE-2300?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 BE-2300 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4505 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron P4505 is the better buy right now. Celeron P4505 comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon X2 BE-2300 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 17.9% better value on MSRP (10.7 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron P4505 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs Celeron P4505 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon X2 BE-2300

    The Athlon X2 BE-2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Celeron P4505

    The Celeron P4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 918 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon X2 BE-2300 and Celeron P4505 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 versus 0.07 GHz on the Celeron P4505 — a 185.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2300. The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron P4505 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2300 scores 905 against the Celeron P4505's 918 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron P4505. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 vs 2 MB on the Celeron P4505.

    FeatureAthlon X2 BE-2300Celeron P4505
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.9 GHz+2614%
    0.07 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.86 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    2 MB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB
    Process
    65 nm
    32 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Brisbane (2007−2008)
    Westmere (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    905
    918+1%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon X2 BE-2300 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron P4505 uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2300 versus 1066 on the Celeron P4505 — the Celeron P4505 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2300 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2300) vs 16 (Celeron P4505) — the Celeron P4505 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2300) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4505).

    FeatureAthlon X2 BE-2300Celeron P4505
    Socket
    AM2
    BGA1288
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-800
    1066+33%
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB+100%
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2300) / true (Celeron P4505). The Celeron P4505 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Athlon X2 BE-2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4505 rivals Pentium P6000.

    FeatureAthlon X2 BE-2300Celeron P4505
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    true
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon X2 BE-2300 was priced at $100, while the Celeron P4505 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($100 vs $86), Celeron P4505 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 BE-2300 delivers 9.1 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the Celeron P4505 — making the Celeron P4505 the 16.5% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon X2 BE-2300Celeron P4505
    MSRP
    $100
    $86-14%
    Performance per Dollar
    9.1
    10.7+18%
    Release Date
    2007
    2010

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.