Athlon X2 QL-65
VS
A8-5545M

Athlon X2 QL-65 vs A8-5545M

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-65

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A8-5545M

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 QL-65 is positioned at rank 1056 and the A8-5545M is on rank 756, so the A8-5545M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-65

#1044
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2699%
#1045
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2660%
#1046
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2442%
#1047
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2431%
#1048
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2408%
#1050
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2326%
#1051
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2230%
#1052
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2226%
#1053
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2167%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
100%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
99%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
99%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
98%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
97%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
96%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-5545M

#744
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1081%
#745
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1066%
#746
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
978%
#747
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
974%
#748
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
965%
#750
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
932%
#751
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
893%
#752
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
892%
#753
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
868%
#756
A8-5545M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#757
Core i7-11370H
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
100%
#762
Core i3-N300
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#767
Core i7-1250U
MSRP: $426|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-5545M leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon X2 QL-65 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon X2 QL-65A8-5545M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon X2 QL-65A8-5545M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 QL-65 and A8-5545M

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-65

The Athlon X2 QL-65 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A8-5545M

The A8-5545M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,628 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 QL-65 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-5545M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-5545M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-65 versus 2.7 GHz on the A8-5545M — a 25% clock advantage for the A8-5545M. The Athlon X2 QL-65 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the A8-5545M uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-65 scores 1,630 against the A8-5545M's 1,628 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-65. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65A8-5545M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz+29%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Lion (2008−2009)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,630
1,628
Geekbench 6 Single
288
Geekbench 6 Multi
786
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-65 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-5545M uses FP2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-65 versus DDR3-1333 on the A8-5545M — the A8-5545M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-5545M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 QL-65) vs 16 (A8-5545M) — the A8-5545M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-65) and SoC (A8-5545M).

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65A8-5545M
Socket
S1g2
FP2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 QL-65) / AMD-V (A8-5545M). The A8-5545M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8510G), while the Athlon X2 QL-65 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-5545M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-5545M rivals Core i3-4000M.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65A8-5545M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8510G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Laptop