Athlon X2 QL-65
VS
Pentium 967

Athlon X2 QL-65 vs Pentium 967

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-65

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Pentium 967

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 QL-65 is positioned at rank 1056 and the Pentium 967 is on rank 1031, so the Pentium 967 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-65

#1044
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2699%
#1045
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2660%
#1046
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2442%
#1047
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2431%
#1048
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2408%
#1050
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2326%
#1051
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2230%
#1052
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2226%
#1053
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2167%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
100%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
99%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
99%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
98%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
98%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
98%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
98%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
97%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
96%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
96%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 967

#1019
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2397%
#1020
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2362%
#1021
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2168%
#1022
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2158%
#1023
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2139%
#1025
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2065%
#1026
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1980%
#1027
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1977%
#1028
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1924%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon X2 QL-65 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 967 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon X2 QL-65Pentium 967
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium 967 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 55% cheaper ($10 vs $22) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon X2 QL-65Pentium 967
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+121%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($22)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 QL-65 and Pentium 967

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-65

The Athlon X2 QL-65 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 QL-65 and Pentium 967 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-65 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 — a 47.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 QL-65. The Athlon X2 QL-65 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium 967 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-65 scores 1,630 against the Pentium 967's 1,640 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium 967. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X2 QL-65 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 967.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65Pentium 967
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz+62%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Lion (2008−2009)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,630
1,640
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-65 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 967 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65Pentium 967
Socket
S1g2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon X2 QL-65 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Pentium 967 debuted at $134. At current prices ($22 vs $10), the Pentium 967 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 QL-65 delivers 74.1 pts/$ vs 164.0 pts/$ for the Pentium 967 — making the Pentium 967 the 75.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-65Pentium 967
MSRP
$150
$134-11%
Avg Price (30d)
$22
$10-55%
Performance per Dollar
74.1
164.0+121%
Release Date
2009
2011