A6 PRO-7400B vs Athlon X2 QL-65

A6 PRO-7400B vs Athlon X2 QL-65 Performance Spectrum

A6 PRO-7400B

2 / 2

1,640

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 QL-65

2 / 2

1,630

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Athlon X2 QL-65 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Athlon X2 QL-65: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 PRO-7400B

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Athlon X2 QL-65 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Athlon X2 QL-65

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,630 vs 1,640).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while A6 PRO-7400B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 PRO-7400B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6 PRO-7400B better than Athlon X2 QL-65?

Yes. A6 PRO-7400B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6 PRO-7400B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6 PRO-7400B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6 PRO-7400B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6 PRO-7400B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X2 QL-65 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 PRO-7400B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Athlon X2 QL-65 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 PRO-7400B

The A6 PRO-7400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon X2 QL-65

The Athlon X2 QL-65 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6 PRO-7400B and Athlon X2 QL-65 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6 PRO-7400B versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-65 — a 60% clock advantage for the A6 PRO-7400B. The A6 PRO-7400B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-65 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6 PRO-7400B scores 1,640 against the Athlon X2 QL-65's 1,630 — a 0.6% lead for the A6 PRO-7400B.

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Athlon X2 QL-65
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+86%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	1 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,640	1,630

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 PRO-7400B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-65 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6 PRO-7400B versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-65 — the A6 PRO-7400B supports 179.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 PRO-7400B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6 PRO-7400B) vs 0 (Athlon X2 QL-65) — the A6 PRO-7400B offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (A6 PRO-7400B) and AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-65).

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Athlon X2 QL-65
Socket	FM2+	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+180%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+700%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0