A6 PRO-7400B vs Core i3-2357M

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core i3-2357M Performance Spectrum

A6 PRO-7400B

2 / 2

1,640

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2357M

2 / 4

1,645

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core i3-2357M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core i3-2357M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 PRO-7400B

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,640 vs 1,645).
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Core i3-2357M

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2357M better than A6 PRO-7400B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 PRO-7400B is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2357M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2357M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2357M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6 PRO-7400B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core i3-2357M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 PRO-7400B

The A6 PRO-7400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-2357M

The Core i3-2357M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,645 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 PRO-7400B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2357M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6 PRO-7400B versus 1.3 GHz on the Core i3-2357M — a 100% clock advantage for the A6 PRO-7400B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A6 PRO-7400B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-2357M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6 PRO-7400B scores 1,640 against the Core i3-2357M's 1,645 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-2357M.

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Core i3-2357M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+200%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+169%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,640	1,645
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	440
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	440

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 PRO-7400B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2357M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6 PRO-7400B versus 1333 on the Core i3-2357M — the A6 PRO-7400B supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6 PRO-7400B supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (A6 PRO-7400B) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i3-2357M).

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Core i3-2357M
Socket	FM2+	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6 PRO-7400B) / true (Core i3-2357M). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon R5 (A6 PRO-7400B) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2357M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i3-2357M rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.