A6 PRO-7400B vs Core M-5Y10

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core M-5Y10 Performance Spectrum

A6 PRO-7400B

2 / 2

1,640

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core M-5Y10

2 / 4

1,644

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core M-5Y10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core M-5Y10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6 PRO-7400B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Core M-5Y10 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,640 vs 1,644).

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6 PRO-7400B across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A6 PRO-7400B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6 PRO-7400B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y10 better than A6 PRO-7400B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6 PRO-7400B is ahead with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y10 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y10 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y10 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The compromise is that A6 PRO-7400B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6 PRO-7400B vs Core M-5Y10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6 PRO-7400B

The A6 PRO-7400B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $69.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6 PRO-7400B packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core M-5Y10's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A6 PRO-7400B versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 64.4% clock advantage for the A6 PRO-7400B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The A6 PRO-7400B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6 PRO-7400B scores 1,640 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.2% lead for the Core M-5Y10.

Feature	A6 PRO-7400B	Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+95%	2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+338%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1024 kB+300%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,640	1,644

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6 PRO-7400B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.