
Athlon X4 730

Core i7-940XM
Athlon X4 730 vs Core i7-940XM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 730 vs Core i7-940XM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 730 vs Core i7-940XM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 730
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,036 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $1,096 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1733.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.0 vs 2.1 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $1,096 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Core i7-940XM
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,269 vs 2,278).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 38.0 PassMark/$ ($1,096 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 730 better than Core i7-940XM?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 730 vs Core i7-940XM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 730
The Athlon X4 730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i7-940XM
The Core i7-940XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $1,096.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 730 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-940XM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 730 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-940XM — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i7-940XM (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Athlon X4 730 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-940XM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 730 scores 2,278 against the Core i7-940XM's 2,269 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 730.
| Feature | Athlon X4 730 | Core i7-940XM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.33 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+31% | 2.13 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Clarksfield (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 2,278 | 2,269 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 730 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-940XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 730 versus 1333 on the Core i7-940XM — the Athlon X4 730 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 730 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 730) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-940XM).
| Feature | Athlon X4 730 | Core i7-940XM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+40% | 1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+700% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 730) / true (Core i7-940XM). Direct competitor: Core i7-940XM rivals Core i7-2720QM.
| Feature | Athlon X4 730 | Core i7-940XM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 730 was priced at $60, while the Core i7-940XM came in at $1096. On launch pricing ($60 vs $1096), Athlon X4 730 was $1036 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 730 delivers 38.0 pts/$ vs 2.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-940XM — making the Athlon X4 730 the 179.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 730 | Core i7-940XM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-95% | $1096 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.0+1710% | 2.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















