A10-6700T vs Athlon X4 730

A10-6700T vs Athlon X4 730 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X4 730

4 / 4

2,278

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Athlon X4 730 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Athlon X4 730: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650D, while Athlon X4 730 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 730.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon X4 730

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,278 vs 2,299).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A10-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Athlon X4 730?

Yes. A10-6700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X4 730 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (38.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700T vs Athlon X4 730 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon X4 730

The Athlon X4 730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-6700T and Athlon X4 730 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 730 — a 9% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 730 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Athlon X4 730's 2,278 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-6700T.

Feature	A10-6700T	Athlon X4 730
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	4096 kB	4 MB (total)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,299	2,278
Geekbench 6 Single	289	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FM2 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon X4 730 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T) and AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 730).

Feature	A10-6700T	Athlon X4 730
Socket	FM2	FM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	64 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700T) / not specified (Athlon X4 730). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Athlon X4 730 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.