A10-6700T vs Core i7-1060G7

A10-6700T vs Core i7-1060G7 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-1060G7

4 / 8

2,322

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-1060G7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-1060G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-1060G7.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1060G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,299 vs 2,322).
❌400% higher power demand at 45W vs 9W.

Core i7-1060G7

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 9W instead of 45W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-1060G7 better than A10-6700T?

Yes. Core i7-1060G7 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-1060G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-1060G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-1060G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-1060G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1060G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-1060G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-1060G7

The Core i7-1060G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake (Client) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 2,322 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-1060G7's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-1060G7 — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-1060G7 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses Ice Lake (Client) (2019) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Core i7-1060G7's 2,322 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-1060G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 289 vs 1,523, a 136.2% lead for the Core i7-1060G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1060G7.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i7-1060G7
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+150%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ice Lake (Client) (2019)
PassMark	2,299	2,322+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	289	1,523+427%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-1060G7 uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700T versus LPDDR4-3733 on the Core i7-1060G7 — the Core i7-1060G7 supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T) and Ice Lake-Y (Core i7-1060G7).

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i7-1060G7
Socket	FM2	BGA1440
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	LPDDR4-3733+100%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1060G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1060G7). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650D (A10-6700T) and Iris Plus Graphics (Core i7-1060G7) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power, Core i7-1060G7 targets Premium Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T; Core i7-1060G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4700U.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i7-1060G7
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8650D	Iris Plus Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Low Power	Premium Ultrabook