A10-6700T vs Xeon X3350

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3350 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3350

2,291

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650D, while Xeon X3350 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X3350.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3350 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon X3350

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,291 vs 2,299).
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Xeon X3350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-6700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T still makes the most sense overall. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon X3350

The Xeon X3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,291 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700T is built on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Xeon X3350's 2,291 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-6700T. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3350.

Feature	A10-6700T	Xeon X3350
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.66 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	0 kB	12 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	4096 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	—
PassMark	2,299	2,291
Geekbench 6 Single	289	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3350 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6700T	Xeon X3350
Socket	FM2	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700T) / not specified (Xeon X3350). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Xeon X3350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.