A10-6700T vs Core m5-6Y54

A10-6700T vs Core m5-6Y54 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core m5-6Y54

2 / 4

2,294

0.0%

Pentium Dual Core T4400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Core m5-6Y54 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Core m5-6Y54: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core m5-6Y54.

Trade-offs

❌900% higher power demand at 45W vs 4.5W.

Core m5-6Y54

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-6700T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,294 vs 2,299).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A10-6700T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Core m5-6Y54?

Yes. A10-6700T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-6700T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-6700T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core m5-6Y54 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m5-6Y54 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6700T vs Core m5-6Y54 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Core m5-6Y54

The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m5-6Y54 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Core m5-6Y54's 2,294 — a 0.2% lead for the A10-6700T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 289 vs 875, a 100.7% lead for the Core m5-6Y54 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core m5-6Y54
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+30%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+127%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark	2,299	2,294
Geekbench 6 Single	289	875+203%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,648

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The A10-6700T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-6700T) vs 10 (Core m5-6Y54) — the A10-6700T offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T) and Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54).

Feature	A10-6700T	Core m5-6Y54
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8650D (A10-6700T) and HD Graphics 515 (Core m5-6Y54) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power, Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T; Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.