A10-6700T
VS
Core 2 Duo T7500

A10-6700T vs Core 2 Duo T7500

AMD

A10-6700T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T7500

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-6700T is positioned at rank 514 and the Core 2 Duo T7500 is on rank 88, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-6700T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8135%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7686%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5581%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1681%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1332%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1165%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
667%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
659%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
600%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
600%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
593%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
577%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
569%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
567%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
561%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
99%
#514
A10-6700T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
100%
#518
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#519
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
99%
#520
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
99%
#522
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
98%
#525
Celeron G1840T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#527
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
97%
#528
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
97%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500

#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
94%
#76
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
254%
#77
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
251%
#78
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
230%
#79
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
229%
#80
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
227%
#82
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
219%
#83
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
210%
#84
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
210%
#85
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
204%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
100%
#98
N150
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $128
94%
#102
N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-6700T (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-6700TCore 2 Duo T7500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T7500 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-6700TCore 2 Duo T7500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-6700T and Core 2 Duo T7500

AMD

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.

Processing Power

The A10-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — a 45.6% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2,308 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7500. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA10-6700TCore 2 Duo T7500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.5 GHz+59%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz+14%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
4096 kB
4 MB
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
2,299
2,308
Geekbench 6 Single
289
Geekbench 6 Multi
507
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6700T versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — the A10-6700T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A78,A88X (A10-6700T) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500).

FeatureA10-6700TCore 2 Duo T7500
Socket
FM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6700T) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power, Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T; Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureA10-6700TCore 2 Duo T7500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8650D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power
Budget