A10-6700T vs Core i7-4550U

A10-6700T vs Core i7-4550U Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-4550U

2 / 4

2,307

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-4550U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-4550U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650D, while Core i7-4550U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4550U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,299 vs 2,307).

Core i7-4550U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Core i7-4550U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-6700T is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4550U pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4550U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T still makes the most sense overall. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4550U is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10-6700T vs Core i7-4550U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-4550U

The Core i7-4550U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,307 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-6700T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4550U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-6700T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-4550U — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4550U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Core i7-4550U's 2,307 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4550U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4550U.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i7-4550U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+17%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+67%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Haswell-ULT (2013)
PassMark	2,299	2,307
Geekbench 6 Single	289	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4550U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6700T	Core i7-4550U
Socket	FM2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700T) / not specified (Core i7-4550U). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Core i7-4550U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.