A10-6700T vs Xeon X3430

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3430 Performance Spectrum

A10-6700T

4 / 4

2,299

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon X3430

4 / 4

2,320

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3430 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3430: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-6700T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8650D, while Xeon X3430 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon X3430.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,299 vs 2,320).

Xeon X3430

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6700T.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-6700T better than Xeon X3430?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3430 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-6700T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X3430 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-6700T still makes the most sense overall. A10-6700T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-6700T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-6700T vs Xeon X3430 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6700T

The A10-6700T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,299 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon X3430

The Xeon X3430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $189.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-6700T and Xeon X3430 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A10-6700T versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon X3430 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-6700T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A10-6700T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X3430 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6700T scores 2,299 against the Xeon X3430's 2,320 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon X3430. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6700T vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3430.

Feature	A10-6700T	Xeon X3430
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+4%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,299	2,320
Geekbench 6 Single	289	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-6700T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3430 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-6700T	Xeon X3430
Socket	FM2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6700T) / not specified (Xeon X3430). The A10-6700T includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650D), while the Xeon X3430 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6700T targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A10-6700T rivals Core i3-4130T.