Athlon X4 730 vs E2-7110

Athlon X4 730 vs E2-7110 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 730

4 / 4

2,278

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E2-7110

4 / 4

2,282

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 730 vs E2-7110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 730 vs E2-7110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 730

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,278 vs 2,282).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while E2-7110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

E2-7110

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-7110 better than Athlon X4 730?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X4 730 is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-7110 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-7110 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-7110 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark. Athlon X4 730 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (38.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-7110 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 730 vs E2-7110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 730

The Athlon X4 730 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,278 points. Launch price was $149.

E2-7110

The E2-7110 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo-L (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,282 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 730 and E2-7110 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon X4 730 versus 1.8 GHz on the E2-7110 — a 56% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 730. The Athlon X4 730 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E2-7110 uses Carrizo-L (2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 730 scores 2,278 against the E2-7110's 2,282 — a 0.2% lead for the E2-7110.

Feature	Athlon X4 730	E2-7110
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+78%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4 MB (total)+100%	2048 kB
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Carrizo-L (2015)
PassMark	2,278	2,282