Athlon X4 830 vs PRO A10-9700E

Athlon X4 830 vs PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 830

4 / 4

3,018

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

PRO A10-9700E

4 / 4

3,057

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 830 vs PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 830 vs PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 830

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,018 vs 3,057).
❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while PRO A10-9700E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

PRO A10-9700E

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-9700E better than Athlon X4 830?

Yes. PRO A10-9700E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-9700E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-9700E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-9700E is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A10-9700E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X4 830 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (43.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-9700E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 830 vs PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 830

The Athlon X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,018 points. Launch price was $149.

PRO A10-9700E

The PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,057 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 830 and PRO A10-9700E share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Athlon X4 830 versus 3.5 GHz on the PRO A10-9700E — a 2.9% clock advantage for the PRO A10-9700E (base: 3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Athlon X4 830 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 830 scores 3,018 against the PRO A10-9700E's 3,057 — a 1.3% lead for the PRO A10-9700E.

Feature	Athlon X4 830	PRO A10-9700E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2048 kB
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,018	3,057+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 830 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-9700E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.