
A10-5800B

Athlon X4 830
A10-5800B vs Athlon X4 830 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-5800B vs Athlon X4 830 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-5800B vs Athlon X4 830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-5800B
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Athlon X4 830 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon X4 830.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Athlon X4 830
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,018 vs 3,027).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while A10-5800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.
Quick Answers
So, is A10-5800B better than Athlon X4 830?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-5800B vs Athlon X4 830 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B
The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon X4 830
The Athlon X4 830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,018 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A10-5800B and Athlon X4 830 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 3.4 GHz on the Athlon X4 830 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 830 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Athlon X4 830's 3,018 — a 0.3% lead for the A10-5800B.
| Feature | A10-5800B | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+24% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Kaveri (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,027 | 3,018 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 459 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 830 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5800B versus DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 830 — the Athlon X4 830 supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 830 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800B) and AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 830).
| Feature | A10-5800B | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-2133+14% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800B) / not specified (Athlon X4 830). The A10-5800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Athlon X4 830 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220.
| Feature | A10-5800B | Athlon X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660D | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Office | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















