A10-5800B vs Xeon L5630

A10-5800B vs Xeon L5630 Performance Spectrum

A10-5800B

4 / 4

3,027

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon L5630

4 / 8

3,048

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800B vs Xeon L5630 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800B vs Xeon L5630: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800B

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Xeon L5630 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon L5630.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L5630 across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,027 vs 3,048).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L5630, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.

Xeon L5630

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.8% higher average FPS across 11 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon L5630 better than A10-5800B?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L5630 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-5800B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon L5630 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.8% more average FPS across 11 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon L5630 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon L5630 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon L5630 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.8% average FPS lead across 11 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-5800B vs Xeon L5630 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B

The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Xeon L5630

The Xeon L5630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,048 points. Launch price was $1,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon L5630's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon L5630 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon L5630 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Xeon L5630's 3,048 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon L5630. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800B vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5630.

Feature	A10-5800B	Xeon L5630
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+75%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+78%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	3,027	3,048
Geekbench 6 Single	459	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon L5630 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800B	Xeon L5630
Socket	FM2	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800B) / not specified (Xeon L5630). The A10-5800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon L5630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220.