A10-5800B vs Core i5-4310M

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4310M Performance Spectrum

A10-5800B

4 / 4

3,027

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4310M

2 / 4

3,067

+1.3%

Core 2 Duo T7200

Core 2 Duo SL9600

Core i5-661

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4310M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4310M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800B

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core i5-4310M needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4310M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,027 vs 3,067).

Core i5-4310M

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800B across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4310M better than A10-5800B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5800B is ahead with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4310M pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4310M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4310M still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4310M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4310M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4310M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B

The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4310M

The Core i5-4310M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,067 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4310M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4310M — a 21.1% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4310M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Core i5-4310M's 3,067 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-4310M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800B vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4310M.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i5-4310M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+24%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+41%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,027	3,067+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	459	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4310M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i5-4310M
Socket	FM2	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800B) / not specified (Core i5-4310M). The A10-5800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core i5-4310M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220.