A10-5800B vs Core i7-860

A10-5800B vs Core i7-860 Performance Spectrum

A10-5800B

4 / 4

3,027

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-860

4 / 8

3,011

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800B vs Core i7-860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800B vs Core i7-860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800B

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7660D, while Core i7-860 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-860.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-860

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 100W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,011 vs 3,027).
❌Launch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while A10-5800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-5800B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-5800B better than Core i7-860?

Yes. A10-5800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-5800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-5800B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-5800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $284 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-860 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1156.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-5800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5800B vs Core i7-860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B

The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-860

The Core i7-860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,011 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-860's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-860 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Core i7-860's 3,011 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-5800B. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800B vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-860.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i7-860
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+21%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,027	3,011
Geekbench 6 Single	459	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-860 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i7-860
Socket	FM2	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-5800B) / not specified (Core i7-860). The A10-5800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core i7-860 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220.