A10-5800B vs Core i5-4200H

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4200H Performance Spectrum

A10-5800B

4 / 4

3,027

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4200H

2 / 4

3,036

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4200H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4200H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800B

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-4200H.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,027 vs 3,036).

Core i5-4200H

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800B across 39 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800B.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200H better than A10-5800B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-5800B is ahead with a 7.1% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4200H still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4200H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-5800B vs Core i5-4200H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-5800B

The A10-5800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,027 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4200H

The Core i5-4200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,036 points. Launch price was $257.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-5800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4200H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800B versus 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4200H — a 21.1% clock advantage for the A10-5800B (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-5800B uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4200H uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800B scores 3,027 against the Core i5-4200H's 3,036 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4200H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 459 vs 990, a 73.3% lead for the Core i5-4200H that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800B vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200H.

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i5-4200H
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+24%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+36%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,027	3,036
Geekbench 6 Single	459	990+116%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,927

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-5800B uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4200H uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5800B versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200H — the A10-5800B supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800B) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200H).

Feature	A10-5800B	Core i5-4200H
Socket	FM2	BGA1364
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5800B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200H). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5800B) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4200H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800B targets Office, Core i5-4200H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: A10-5800B rivals Core i3-3220; Core i5-4200H rivals Core i7-4500U.