
Athlon X4 850

Core i5-8210Y
Athlon X4 850 vs Core i5-8210Y Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 850 vs Core i5-8210Y FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Cyberpunk 2077

Deadlock

Delta Force
Athlon X4 850 vs Core i5-8210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 850
2015Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $77 MSRP, while Core i5-8210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-8210Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-8210Y
2018Why buy it
- β Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 617, while Athlon X4 850 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 850 across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,723 vs 2,756).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 850 better than Core i5-8210Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 850 vs Core i5-8210Y Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 850
The Athlon X4 850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014β2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,756 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-8210Y
The Core i5-8210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018β2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,723 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-8210Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads β the Athlon X4 850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Athlon X4 850 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-8210Y β a 8% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 850 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Athlon X4 850 uses the Godaveri (2014β2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-8210Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018β2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 850 scores 2,756 against the Core i5-8210Y's 2,723 β a 1.2% lead for the Athlon X4 850.
| Feature | Athlon X4 850 | Core i5-8210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+8% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+100% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014β2016) | Amber Lake-Y (2018β2021) |
| PassMark | 2,756+1% | 2,723 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 796 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 850 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8210Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Athlon X4 850 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 850) vs 10 (Core i5-8210Y) β the Athlon X4 850 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 850) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8210Y).
| Feature | Athlon X4 850 | Core i5-8210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | LPDDR3-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+60% | 10 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon X4 850 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X4 850) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8210Y). The Core i5-8210Y includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 617), while the Athlon X4 850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X4 850 targets Desktop, Core i5-8210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Core i5-8210Y rivals Athlon 3050U.
| Feature | Athlon X4 850 | Core i5-8210Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | UHD Graphics 617 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Tablet/2-in-1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















