Athlon X4 860K vs Core i3-4150
Athlon X4 860K
Core i3-4150
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 860K is positioned at rank 480 and the Core i3-4150 is on rank 960, so the Athlon X4 860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 860K
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4150
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+252%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($70) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 860K and Core i3-4150
Athlon X4 860K
The Athlon X4 860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i3-4150
The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 860K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 860K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 860K versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 860K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Athlon X4 860K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4150 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 860K scores 3,425 against the Core i3-4150's 3,406 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon X4 860K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+14% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+6% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,425 | 3,406 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,071 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4150 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The Athlon X4 860K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2+ (Athlon X4 860K) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4150).
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 860K) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150). The Core i3-4150 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon X4 860K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Budget Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 860K launched at $80 MSRP, while the Core i3-4150 debuted at $281. At current prices ($20 vs $70), the Athlon X4 860K is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 860K delivers 171.3 pts/$ vs 48.7 pts/$ for the Core i3-4150 — making the Athlon X4 860K the 111.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-72% | $281 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-71% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 171.3+252% | 48.7 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 860K and Core i3-4150
