Athlon X4 860K vs Phenom II X6 1065T
Athlon X4 860K
Phenom II X6 1065T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 860K is positioned at rank 480 and the Phenom II X6 1065T is on rank 1030, so the Athlon X4 860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 860K
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1065T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X4 860K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X4 860K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+753%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($20) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($170) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 860K and Phenom II X6 1065T
Athlon X4 860K
The Athlon X4 860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,425 points. Launch price was $149.
Phenom II X6 1065T
The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 860K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1065T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 860K versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 860K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 860K uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 860K scores 3,425 against the Phenom II X6 1065T's 3,412 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 860K.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+28% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Thuban (2010) |
| PassMark | 3,425 | 3,412 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 860K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X4 860K launched at $80 MSRP, while the Phenom II X6 1065T debuted at $426. At current prices ($20 vs $170), the Athlon X4 860K is $150 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 860K delivers 171.3 pts/$ vs 20.1 pts/$ for the Phenom II X6 1065T — making the Athlon X4 860K the 158% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 860K | Phenom II X6 1065T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-81% | $426 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-88% | $170 |
| Performance per Dollar | 171.3+752% | 20.1 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X4 860K and Phenom II X6 1065T
