Athlon X4 970
VS
Xeon E5-2407

Athlon X4 970 vs Xeon E5-2407

AMD

Athlon X4 970

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2407

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X4 970 is positioned at rank 582 and the Xeon E5-2407 is on rank 852, so the Athlon X4 970 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 970

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10020%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9468%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6874%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2071%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1640%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1435%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
822%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
811%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
739%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
739%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
730%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
711%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
701%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
698%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
691%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
100%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
100%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
100%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
98%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2407

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19532%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3688%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3277%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2531%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
100%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
99%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
98%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
98%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
96%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
96%
#852
Xeon E5-2407
MSRP: $250|Avg: $25
100%
#857
Xeon 5120
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
98%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
98%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
97%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
97%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon X4 970 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon X4 970Xeon E5-2407
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($25)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2407 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon X4 970Xeon E5-2407
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+242%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($85)
More affordable ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X4 970 and Xeon E5-2407

AMD

Athlon X4 970

The Athlon X4 970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,644 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2407

The Xeon E5-2407 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $335.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 970 and Xeon E5-2407 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 970 versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2407 — a 58.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 970 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon X4 970 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 970 scores 2,644 against the Xeon E5-2407's 2,659 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2407. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X4 970 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2407.

FeatureAthlon X4 970Xeon E5-2407
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+82%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+73%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark
2,644
2,659
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X4 970 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2407 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon X4 970Xeon E5-2407
Socket
AM4
LGA1356
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon X4 970 launched at $85 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2407 debuted at $250. At current prices ($85 vs $25), the Xeon E5-2407 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 970 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 106.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2407 — making the Xeon E5-2407 the 109.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X4 970Xeon E5-2407
MSRP
$85-66%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$85
$25-71%
Performance per Dollar
31.1
106.4+242%
Release Date
2017
2012