
Athlon X4 740

Athlon X4 970
Athlon X4 740 vs Athlon X4 970 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 740 vs Athlon X4 970 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 740 vs Athlon X4 970: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 740
2012Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($71 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($71 MSRP vs $85 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Athlon X4 970
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,644 vs 2,646).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 37.3 PassMark/$ ($85 MSRP vs $71 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 740 better than Athlon X4 970?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 740 vs Athlon X4 970 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 740
The Athlon X4 740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,646 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon X4 970
The Athlon X4 970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,644 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X4 740 and Athlon X4 970 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Athlon X4 740 versus 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 970 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 970 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Athlon X4 740 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X4 970 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 740 scores 2,646 against the Athlon X4 970's 2,644 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X4 740.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.8 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 28 nm-13% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,646 | 2,644 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 740 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X4 970 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 740 versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon X4 970 — the Athlon X4 970 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon X4 740) vs 8 (Athlon X4 970) — the Athlon X4 740 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM2 (Athlon X4 740) and AMD AM4 (Athlon X4 970).
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400+29% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 740) / not specified (Athlon X4 970). Primary use case: Athlon X4 740 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 740 was priced at $71, while the Athlon X4 970 came in at $85. On launch pricing ($71 vs $85), Athlon X4 740 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 740 delivers 37.3 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 970 — making the Athlon X4 740 the 18% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 740 | Athlon X4 970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $71-16% | $85 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.3+20% | 31.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















