
A12-9720P

Athlon X4 740
A12-9720P vs Athlon X4 740 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9720P vs Athlon X4 740 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A12-9720P vs Athlon X4 740: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9720P
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Athlon X4 740 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,622 vs 2,646).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 37.3 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $71 MSRP).
Athlon X4 740
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($71 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 184.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($71 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A12-9720P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X4 740 better than A12-9720P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9720P vs Athlon X4 740 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9720P
The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon X4 740
The Athlon X4 740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,646 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A12-9720P and Athlon X4 740 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P versus 3.7 GHz on the Athlon X4 740 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 740 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A12-9720P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon X4 740 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9720P scores 2,622 against the Athlon X4 740's 2,646 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X4 740.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Athlon X4 740 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz+19% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,622 | 2,646 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 529 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9720P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X4 740 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-1866 memory speed. The Athlon X4 740 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9720P) vs 16 (Athlon X4 740) — the Athlon X4 740 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Athlon X4 740 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A12-9720P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Athlon X4 740 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9720P targets Laptop, Athlon X4 740 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Athlon X4 740 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Laptop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A12-9720P was priced at $200, while the Athlon X4 740 came in at $71. On launch pricing ($200 vs $71), Athlon X4 740 was $129 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9720P delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 37.3 pts/$ for the Athlon X4 740 — making the Athlon X4 740 the 95.9% better value option.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Athlon X4 740 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $71-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 37.3+185% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















