A12-9720P
VS
Core i5-4288U

A12-9720P vs Core i5-4288U

AMD

A12-9720P

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core i5-4288U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A12-9720P is positioned at rank 1016 and the Core i5-4288U is on rank 1135, so the A12-9720P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A12-9720P

#1004
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2238%
#1005
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2205%
#1006
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2024%
#1007
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2015%
#1008
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1997%
#1010
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1928%
#1011
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1849%
#1012
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1846%
#1013
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1796%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
100%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
99%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
97%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
97%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
96%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4288U

#1123
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3776%
#1124
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3721%
#1125
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3416%
#1126
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3400%
#1127
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3369%
#1129
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3254%
#1130
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3120%
#1131
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3115%
#1132
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3031%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
100%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
99%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4288U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A12-9720P in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the A12-9720P holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $25 (vs $342), it costs 93% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1249% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-4288U.
InsightA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1249%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($342)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A12-9720P and Core i5-4288U

AMD

A12-9720P

The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Core i5-4288U

The Core i5-4288U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,659 points. Launch price was $342.

Processing Power

The A12-9720P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4288U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9720P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4288U — a 14.9% clock advantage for the A12-9720P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A12-9720P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4288U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9720P scores 2,622 against the Core i5-4288U's 2,659 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-4288U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 529 vs 880, a 49.8% lead for the Core i5-4288U that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+16%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+4%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,622
2,659+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
529
880+66%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A12-9720P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4288U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A12-9720P versus DDR3L 1600 MHz on the Core i5-4288U — the Core i5-4288U supports 199.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9720P) vs 12 (Core i5-4288U) — the Core i5-4288U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3L 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
12+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9720P) vs true (Core i5-4288U). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A12-9720P) and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (Core i5-4288U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9720P targets Laptop, Core i5-4288U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Laptop
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The A12-9720P launched at $200 MSRP, while the Core i5-4288U debuted at $342.

FeatureA12-9720PCore i5-4288U
MSRP
$200-42%
$342
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2016
2013