
A12-9720P

Core i5-3320M
A12-9720P vs Core i5-3320M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A12-9720P vs Core i5-3320M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Civilization VI

Dead by Daylight
A12-9720P vs Core i5-3320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A12-9720P
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $25 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,622 vs 2,660).
Core i5-3320M
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is A12-9720P better than Core i5-3320M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A12-9720P vs Core i5-3320M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A12-9720P
The A12-9720P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,622 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-3320M
The Core i5-3320M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,660 points. Launch price was $225.
Processing Power
The A12-9720P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3320M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A12-9720P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the A12-9720P versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-3320M — a 8.7% clock advantage for the A12-9720P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A12-9720P uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-3320M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A12-9720P scores 2,622 against the Core i5-3320M's 2,660 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-3320M.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Core i5-3320M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256K (per core)+12700% |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,622 | 2,660+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 529 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A12-9720P uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3320M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A12-9720P versus 1600 on the Core i5-3320M — the A12-9720P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-3320M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A12-9720P) vs 16 (Core i5-3320M) — the Core i5-3320M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Core i5-3320M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866+17% | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A12-9720P) vs true (Core i5-3320M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A12-9720P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3320M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A12-9720P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A12-9720P rivals Core i5-7200U; Core i5-3320M rivals AMD A10-4600M.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Core i5-3320M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the A12-9720P was priced at $200, while the Core i5-3320M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($200 vs $225), A12-9720P was $25 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A12-9720P delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 11.8 pts/$ for the Core i5-3320M — making the A12-9720P the 10.3% better value option.
| Feature | A12-9720P | Core i5-3320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-11% | $225 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+11% | 11.8 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















